Honda Canada worker awarded with $500,000 in punitive damages
Honda Canada has been shattered with the most severe penalty for firing
an employee with chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS). It is by far the
stiffest price ever imposed in an employment case in the country. This
case is a reminder of how bad things can get for people in workplaces
that are lacking in understanding and compassion.
Kevin Keays
has been with Honda ever since it started its operation in 1986. And he
started developing symptoms of chronic fatigue soon after he began
working at the Honda assembly plant and went on and off of disability
insurance for two years. He was then forced to return to work in 1998
after his benefits were terminated. Keays tried to work out an
adjustment with Honda but his efforts were wasted and instead he was
referred to two doctors who suggested that there nothing wrong with
him. After years of getting the company to recognize his disability and
making the necessary accommodations, he was formally fired in March 29,
2000 as a result of his disability.
Judge McIsaac called
Honda’s conduct outrageous and said its actions “should make the blood
boil of any right thinking individual.” In Keays case, he was only
seeking from the company the reasonable accommodation for his
disability. But the reverse happened – he was terminated. The courts
strongly condemned Honda for firing the employee and described the
company’s action as planned and deliberate, forming a prolonged
corporate conspiracy against Keays.
This case will have a huge
impact for other Canadians who suffer from chronic fatigue syndrome or
CFS. Further, this strikes a significant victory for employees with CFS
and it will also open floodgates to punitive damage claims in wrongful
dismissal cases. Keays was a victim of discrimination and harassment
and Honda should have recognized his illness as a disability.
In addition, the result of this case puts employers in a terrible
dilemma because they are entitled to information and they are going to
have to look very carefully at how they handle employees who are
reluctant to give in.
The court agreed and ruled against Honda
while harshly criticizing the company for discriminating against Keays.
He was awarded two year salary and $500,000 punitive damage. The
decision of Judge McIsaac, thus, sends a message to employers and
companies large and small that reproving and offensive conduct towards
employees is not going to be tolerated and that when it occurs, the
courts are going to be willing to address it.